Trump weaponizes DOJ to crush state AI laws with federal preemption
- Mahmudul Hassan Robin
- 8 hours ago
- 2 min read

Executive order blocks states from AI regulation. DOJ litigation campaign threatened. China rejects H200 chips. GPT-5.2 ties Gemini but can't break away from pack.
Trump's AI order threatens to withhold federal funding from states with "onerous" laws
President Trump's executive order attempts to block all 50 states from passing their own AI regulations, establishing a DOJ task force to launch litigation campaigns against states while instructing Commerce to withhold federal broadband funding from those with "onerous AI laws"—triggering immediate threats of lawsuits from both Democrats and populist Republicans. The White House claims state laws create an impossible patchwork of 50 different regulatory regimes, force companies to "embed ideological bias within models," and impermissibly regulate interstate commerce, but California's Scott Weiner fired back:
"It's absurd for Trump to think he can weaponize the DOJ and Commerce to undermine state rights—we will see them in court."
The order sparked a GOP civil war with populist forces mounting an extensive campaign to derail it, fearing AI job automation will "undermine the party's message to workers" and cost them the midterms, with one source lamenting: "It feels like millions of votes across the country just got traded for thousands of VCs and tech-rich votes in regions Republicans will never win." Is this about winning the AI race or Silicon Valley capturing the federal government?
China's rejection of H200 chips proves US strategy already failed

The chip export strategy collapsed within days as Beijing met with tech firms to restrict access to Nvidia's H200s—the first unmodified Western chips approved for China in 3 years—with AI czar David Sacks admitting "China's rejecting our chips, they don't want them" because they prioritize semiconductor independence over short-term gains. Consider the strategic miscalculation exposed here:
US logic: Flood China with H200s to prevent them developing advanced chips. China's response: Reject imports to protect Huawei and domestic industry
Beijing preparing $70 billion package for domestic chipmaking (vs US $39B). Nvidia: "Export controls fueled America's foreign competitors and cost taxpayers billions"
Sacks revealed the flawed thinking: "Selling lagging chips to China would take market share from Huawei, but the Chinese government figured that out and that's why they're not allowing them." The irony is stunning—three years of export controls meant to slow China instead accelerated their independence while costing American companies billions. Will the $70 billion Chinese semiconductor package be the moment historians mark as when the US lost the chip war?
GPT-5.2 ties Gemini 3 but OpenAI's "Code Red" continues
OpenAI's GPT-5.2 managed to tie Gemini 3 Pro on major benchmarks but failed to decisively pull ahead, with the models essentially neck-and-neck on artificial analysis intelligence index while Claude 4.5 Opus remains competitive—confirming that OpenAI's "Code Red" will continue through next year as they've lost their clear technical advantage. The only bright spot was GPT-5.2 topping the GDP-Val benchmark measuring real-world white collar tasks with economic value, pulling ahead of Opus 4.5, though analysts are "still trying to wrap their head around" the benchmark's actual significance. The tight competition between all premier models means OpenAI can't claim superiority anymore, with their next release anticipated in January as the last chance to break away from the pack. Has the era of one dominant AI model ended permanently, or can OpenAI reclaim their crown?



