top of page

Enterprise AI Is No Longer Experimental

Recent enterprise AI surveys are revealing a clear and important shift in how organizations approach artificial intelligence. What stands out most is not just increased spending or broader adoption, but a fundamental change in leadership. AI is no longer something that CEOs delegate down the organization. Instead, it is rapidly becoming a CEO-led initiative, driven from the very top.


This shift could not have come at a better time. The challenges AI presents today are far more complex than early experimentation phases. AI is no longer about isolated pilots or innovation labs. It is about reshaping how value is created, how decisions are made, and how entire organizations operate. That scale of change requires authority, clarity, and alignment that only top leadership can provide.



AI as the Backbone of Enterprise Strategy


Insights from KPMG’s quarterly pulse survey, which tracks leaders of organizations with over a billion dollars in revenue, show how dramatically attitudes toward AI have evolved. AI is no longer viewed as a future bet or a side initiative. It is increasingly seen as fundamental to enterprise strategy and a defining divider between organizations that lead and those that lag behind.



KPMG’s global head of AI and digital innovation describes AI as the backbone of enterprise strategy, emphasizing that while some organizations stall after early deployments, leaders are scaling rapidly and pulling ahead. The real shift is not about catching the next technology wave, but about fundamentally changing how value is created and sustained across the enterprise.


This mindset is also reflected in investment behavior. AI spending is becoming recession-proof. Organizations now plan to invest an average of well over one hundred million dollars in AI over the next year, and a majority say they will continue investing even if a recession hits or if short-term ROI is difficult to measure. Unlike many past technologies, AI’s power is so evident that long-term commitment feels unavoidable.


ROI Expectations Are Moving Faster Than Expected


While leaders accept that AI requires sustained investment, optimism about returns has accelerated sharply. Just a year ago, most CEOs believed AI would take three to five years to deliver meaningful ROI. Today, the majority expect measurable returns within one to three years, with a growing number anticipating impact within a single year.

This optimism is now reflected across multiple surveys. Nearly sixty percent of enterprise leaders say they expect measurable ROI from AI initiatives within the next twelve months. What is particularly interesting is that organizations are no longer measuring ROI purely through productivity and revenue metrics. Improvements in executive decision-making are increasingly seen as a critical return, reflecting a shift from first-order efficiency gains to deeper strategic value.


Organizations that deploy AI to enhance decision-making, governance, and strategic planning consistently report higher overall ROI. This signals that AI’s greatest impact may lie not just in automating tasks, but in reshaping how leaders think, decide, and act.


The Maturation of Agentic AI


Another key theme emerging from the data is the maturation of how enterprises understand and deploy AI agents. While early enthusiasm led to inflated perceptions of agent adoption, more recent surveys suggest a clearer, more realistic understanding of what truly qualifies as agentic AI.


Reported deployment of AI agents has fluctuated quarter to quarter, but year-over-year adoption has more than doubled. Rather than indicating a slowdown, this appears to reflect better clarity around definitions and practical constraints. Many organizations are recognizing the difference between assisted AI, automated workflows, and truly autonomous agentic systems.


As enterprises move from experimentation to deployment, new challenges surface. Leaders cite complexity, lack of infrastructure, unclear strategies, and inconsistent usage as major barriers. These challenges are not signs of failure, but natural indicators that organizations are pushing AI deeper into mission-critical operations where rigor, governance, and architecture matter.


AI Is Reshaping the Workforce


As AI adoption deepens, its impact on hiring and workforce structure is becoming undeniable. Organizations report changes in how they hire both experienced and entry-level roles. Entirely new positions have emerged, including AI prompt engineers, AI performance analysts, and AI trainers or data curators.


Employers are increasingly willing to pay a premium for candidates with strong AI skills, and demand is rising not only for technical proficiency but for adaptability, critical thinking, and continuous learning. These shifts highlight that AI transformation is not just a technology challenge, but a people and capability challenge as well.


Security and Governance Take Center Stage


With greater adoption comes greater risk, and cyber security has become one of the most pressing concerns in enterprise AI strategy. A significant portion of AI budgets is now being allocated to model governance, data lineage, and securing agentic architectures. For many leaders, cyber risk is the single biggest barrier to achieving AI goals.


This growing focus signals a move away from isolated AI deployments toward orchestrated, enterprise-wide AI ecosystems. As AI becomes embedded across processes and decisions, security and governance are no longer optional safeguards but foundational requirements.


Why CEOs Are Taking Control


Across multiple studies, one pattern is remarkably consistent: CEO involvement correlates with higher AI ROI. Use cases driven by founders and C-level executives tend to deliver more transformational impact and are less likely to produce negative returns. This is likely because senior leaders have a holistic view of the organization and the authority to redesign processes end-to-end.


Another major global survey reinforces this shift, showing that AI transformation is moving from CIO-led initiatives to CEO-led mandates. Most CEOs now identify themselves as the primary decision-makers on AI and express growing optimism about its impact. Many also see AI success as existential, believing their own job stability depends on getting AI right.


CEOs across regions share this enthusiasm, though motivations differ. In Western markets, leaders often act out of fear of falling behind, while in regions like China and India, CEOs are more likely to act because they see direct value creation. Regardless of motivation, commitment is strong, with a significant portion of AI budgets now dedicated to agentic systems.


Bangladesh’s Moment in the Global AI Shift


As enterprises around the world accelerate AI adoption, Bangladesh is emerging as a serious player in AI software development. A large and continuously growing pool of skilled software engineers, combined with increasing exposure to complex global projects, has positioned Bangladeshi teams to move beyond basic outsourcing into advanced AI product development.


Leading this transition is Kaz Software, which has been at the forefront of delivering production-grade AI systems for global clients. By working closely with CEOs, founders, and enterprise leadership teams, Kaz Software helps translate strategic AI vision into scalable, secure, and measurable solutions. Their work spans conversational AI, computer vision, data analytics, agentic systems, and AI-driven automation, aligning directly with the trends highlighted in these global surveys. Kaz has won the region's most prestigious Asia Smart Innovation Award 2025 for AI development.



As AI reaches a new inflection point, where transformation rather than experimentation defines success, companies that combine strong leadership with deep engineering execution will pull ahead. Bangladesh, powered by teams like Kaz Software, is increasingly part of that leading group.


The data is clear. AI is no longer a delegated initiative. It is a leadership mandate, a strategic backbone, and a defining force in how organizations compete and survive in the years ahead.

 
 
bottom of page